))
Do Large Language Models Have Theory of Mind? A Benchmark Study
Manage episode 508418736 series 3474385
Вміст надано HackerNoon. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією HackerNoon або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.
This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/do-large-language-models-have-theory-of-mind-a-benchmark-study.
Does GPT-4 really understand us? A benchmark study reveals AI’s surprising Theory of Mind abilities—and where the limits still lie.
Check more stories related to tech-stories at: https://hackernoon.com/c/tech-stories. You can also check exclusive content about #theory-of-mind-ai, #gpt-4-social-intelligence, #ai-higher-order-reasoning, #ai-mental-state-inference, #recursive-reasoning-in-ai, #ai-social-behavior-research, #language-model-benchmarks, #llm-cognitive-abilities, and more.
This story was written by: @escholar. Learn more about this writer by checking @escholar's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.
This article evaluates whether advanced language models like GPT-4 and Flan-PaLM demonstrate Theory of Mind (ToM)—the ability to reason about others’ beliefs, intentions, and emotions. While results show GPT-4 sometimes matches or even exceeds adult human performance on 6th-order ToM tasks, limitations remain: the benchmark is small, English-only, and excludes multimodal signals that shape real human cognition. Future research must expand across cultures, languages, and embodied interactions to truly test AI’s capacity for mind-like reasoning.
323 епізодів
Поширити
