Episode 100: R v Hiller

Legal Listening

ONE HUNDRED OFFICIAL EPISODES! This is our 100th official main episode on the pod and we could not be more excited! For this special episode, we take it back to our origins, with a 2020 decision from Pomerance J out of Windsor. This decision discusses expert evidence and the role it plays when all other evidence is circumstantial. Pomerance J goes into a lengthy discussion of the history of such evidence, what it means, and what the trial judge's role is in this evidence. Before Karly reads you the decision, Karly & Zach chat law school, circumstantial evidence, and some waxing poetic about the law.

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2020/2020onsc6097/2020onsc6097.html?autocompleteStr=r%20v%20hiller&autocompletePos=2

We're now on Patreon! Become a patron, unlock fun bonus content, and support the project here: patreon.com/LegalListening

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [e-mail]

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!