Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
Checked 2+ y ago
Додано two роки тому
Вміст надано David Burrow. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією David Burrow або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - додаток Podcast
Переходьте в офлайн за допомогою програми Player FM !
Переходьте в офлайн за допомогою програми Player FM !
Подкасти, які варто послухати
РЕКЛАМА
<
<div class="span index">1</div> <span><a class="" data-remote="true" data-type="html" href="/series/in-her-ellement">In Her Ellement</a></span>
AI and digital expert Suchi Srinivasan and fintech practice leader Kamila Rakhimova from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) talk to the women at the vanguard of business, digital, and technology. They’re digging into how these powerhouse leaders got where they are—everything from the joy of projects gone right to the realities of family responsibilities. And crucially, asking: what was that moment you knew you weren't merely getting there...you had arrived? That's when you know you're in your element.
Landmark Cases: Informed Consent and Right to Refuse
Manage episode 337244158 series 3380400
Вміст надано David Burrow. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією David Burrow або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.
Part 6: Informed Consent and Right to Refuse (Psychiatric and Life-Saving Treatment) Cases include: Informed Consent Canterbury v. Spence Kaimowitz v. Dept of Mental Health Right to Refuse Psychiatric Treatment Rogers v. Commissioner Rennie v. Klein Washington v. Harper Steel v. Hamilton Cty Hargrave v. Vermont Right to Refuse Life-Saving Treatment Application of the President […]
…
continue reading
11 епізодів
Manage episode 337244158 series 3380400
Вміст надано David Burrow. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією David Burrow або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.
Part 6: Informed Consent and Right to Refuse (Psychiatric and Life-Saving Treatment) Cases include: Informed Consent Canterbury v. Spence Kaimowitz v. Dept of Mental Health Right to Refuse Psychiatric Treatment Rogers v. Commissioner Rennie v. Klein Washington v. Harper Steel v. Hamilton Cty Hargrave v. Vermont Right to Refuse Life-Saving Treatment Application of the President […]
…
continue reading
11 епізодів
Усі епізоди
×F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 11: Potent Potables – Sundry Bits of Information Latin Phrases and Definitions, Statutes and Standards, Phil’s Favorite Phrases, Compare and Contrast Cases
F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 10: Sexual Harassment, Confidentiality and Privilege, and Hypnosis. Sexual Harassment Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson Harris v. Forklift Systems Oncale v. Sundowner Confidentiality/Privilege In re: Lifschutz Doe v. Roe Jaffee v. Redmond Hypnosis State v. Hurd People v. Shirley Rock v. Arkansas
F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 9: Child Custody, Child Abuse and Neglect, Children’s Rights, and Juvenile Sentencing and Delinquency Child Custody Painter v. Bannister Santosky v. Kramer Child Abuse/Neglect Landeros v. Flood People v. Stritzinger (Also Confidentiality) Minnesota v. Andring DeShaney v. Winnebago County Children’s Rights In re: Gault Board of Education v. Rowley Irving v. Tatro Juvenile Sentencing […]…
Part 8: Death Penalty Death Penalty Estelle v. Smith, Barefoot v. Estelle, Ake v. Oklahoma, Ford v. Wainwright, Payne v. Tennessee, Lousiana v. Perry, Atkins v. Virginia, Roper v. Simmons, Clark v. Arizona, Panettie v. Quarterman
F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 7: Liability, Duty to Protect, Emotional Harm, Disability Liability to Patients Roy v. Hartogs Clites v. Iowa Duty to Protect Tarasoff v. Board of Regents Lipari v. Sears Littleton v. Good Samaritan Morgan v. Fairfield Emotional Harm Dillon v. Legg Disability Bragdon v. Abbott Olmstead v. L.C. and E.W. U.S. v. Georgia…
Part 6: Informed Consent and Right to Refuse (Psychiatric and Life-Saving Treatment) Cases include: Informed Consent Canterbury v. Spence Kaimowitz v. Dept of Mental Health Right to Refuse Psychiatric Treatment Rogers v. Commissioner Rennie v. Klein Washington v. Harper Steel v. Hamilton Cty Hargrave v. Vermont Right to Refuse Life-Saving Treatment Application of the President […]…
Part 5: Civil Commitment and Right to Treatment Cases: Commitment Lake v. Cameron, Lessard v. Schmidt, O’Connor v. Donaldson, Addington v. Texas, Parham v. J.R. and J.L., In Re: Burton, Zinermon v. Burch. Right to Treatment Rouse v. Cameron, Wyatt v. Stickney, Donaldson v. O’Connor, Youngberg v. Romeo…
F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 4: Rights of Defendants, Prisoners Rights, Sex Offenders Cases: Defendant’s Rights North Carolina v. Alford, Colorado v. Connelly, Prisoner’s Rights Baxtrom v. Herold, Estelle v. Gamble, Vitek v. Jones, Farmer v. Brennan, Brown v. Plata, Sex Offenders Specht v. Patterson, Allen v. Illinois, In re: Young and Cunningham, Seling v. Young, Kansas v. Hendricks, […]…
F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 3: Insanity Cases: M’Naughan, Durham v. U.S., Washington v. U.S., Frendak v. U.S., Jones v. U.S., Federal Insanity Defense Reform Act, and Foucha v. Louisiana
F
Forensic Psychiatry Landmark Cases
Part 2: Cases regarding Expert Witnesses, Diminished Capacity, and Drugs and Alcohol Cases: Diminished Capacity Ibn-Tamas v. U.S., Montana v. Egelhoff, Expert Witness Testimoney Frye v. U.S., Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, Drugs and Alcohol Robinson v. California, and Powell v. Texas…
This is just a little project to help me get ready for some upcoming exams. Part 1: Competence to Stand Trial Cases: Dusky v. U.S., Wilson v. U.S., Jackson v. Indiana, Riggins v. Nevada, Godinez v. Moran, Cooper v. Oklahoma, Indiana v. Edwards, and Sell v. U.S.
Ласкаво просимо до Player FM!
Player FM сканує Інтернет для отримання високоякісних подкастів, щоб ви могли насолоджуватися ними зараз. Це найкращий додаток для подкастів, який працює на Android, iPhone і веб-сторінці. Реєстрація для синхронізації підписок між пристроями.