))
Episode 10: The questionable ethics behind forced smoke inhalation research
Manage episode 387728387 series 2935422
Вміст надано rachel smith and Rachel smith. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією rachel smith and Rachel smith або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.
For several years, Animal-Free Science Advocacy has been closely monitoring the use of forced inhalation studies in Australian Institutions.
This led to the development of our report: "Optimising Inhalation Research: Transitioning to Human-relevant Science."
In this episode, we learn from Animal-Free Science Advocacy CEO Rachel Smith about the questionable ethics that surround the use of animals in smoke inhalation studies. These obsolete tests continue to be used in some Australian universities and research institutes.
There are safe, precise and animal-free methods that can be used instead of these tests.
Read our report: Optimising Inhalation Research: Transitioning to Human-relevant Science
Learn more about our Forced to Smoke campaign.
Connect with HRA in the following ways:
Website: https://www.humaneresearch.org.au/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HumaneResearchAustralia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/humaneresearch/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hraust?lang=en
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/humane-research-australia
17 епізодів
Поширити
