NCLA Digs Deeper Into SCOTUS Victory in Garland v. Cargill and the Definition of a "machinegun"

Administrative Static Podcast

Вміст надано 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.

8M ago 12:30

MP3•Головна епізоду

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on August 13, 2024 17:49 (6M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 in the NCLA case of Garland v. Cargill that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ unilateral bump-stock ban conflicts with the federal statute defining “machineguns.”

ATF’s regulatory ban, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit shot down early last year, reversed the agency’s own long-standing recognition that bump-stock-equipped firearms are not machine guns.

NCLA commends the high court for permanently setting ATF’s ban aside, safeguarding the rights of our client Michael Cargill and hundreds of thousands of other Americans to be free from laws written by executive branch bureaucrats instead of elected members of Congress.

Mark, John, and Jenin celebrate this victory and dive into the case and the meaning of "machineguns" in this latest episode.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

105 епізодів

#News #Government #1360 KHNC #Administrative Static