NCLA Amicus Brief in NY Case Against Trump Explains Why NY’s Executive Law Violates Free Speech

Administrative Static Podcast

Вміст надано 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.

6M ago 12:30

MP3•Головна епізоду

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on August 13, 2024 17:49 (6M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

NCLA, with its founder Professor Philip Hamburger, has filed a crucial amicus curiae brief in the case of New York v. Donald Trump. They are challenging a New York law used by Attorney General Letitia James to prosecute Trump for alleged fraud. Unlike typical fraud cases, New York Executive Law § 63.12 allows for penalties simply for making incorrect business statements, without needing to prove intent or harm.

NCLA argues that this law infringes on First Amendment rights and is urging the court to overturn it to safeguard free speech for everyone. In this episode, Mark, Vec, and Senior Litigation Counsel Greg Dolin discuss the case and its broader implications.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

105 епізодів

#News #Government #1360 KHNC #Administrative Static