))
How can we ensure that global surveillance programs like the one Snowden exposed are good for society? - Michael Vogman
Manage episode 311957405 series 3205773
Вміст надано Adam Kruger. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією Adam Kruger або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.
In this episode, Michael Vogman and I discuss global surveillance programs and how they related to the tradeoff between privacy and security.
Follow-up questions we discussed included:
- How do you balance the need for safety and security with privacy?
- Is it inevitable that we will have to surveil everyone given technology/weapons are getting more and more powerful?
- Let’s say the right thing to do is surveil everyone, but the public wouldn’t agree to it; should the government do it secretly in our best interest?
- Google CEO Eric Schmidt articulated a blunt defence in a famous 2009 interview with Maria Bartiromo. “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know,” Schmidt said, “maybe you shouldn’t be doing that in the first place.”; do you buy this argument against privacy? It’s known as the “nothing to hide” argument
- Would you be supportive of a software program owned by the government listening in on all phone and in-person conversations that flags when you say certain things? What about something implanted like Neuralink that monitors your thoughts?
- Are privacy and security in opposition? Can we achieve both?
Relevant article:
The Personal Privacy vs. Public Security Dilemma | RealClearPolitics
Get help building habits with everyday.
Sign-up here to join me for an episode!
I'd also love feedback for improving future episodes.
Thanks for listening!
68 епізодів
Поширити
