Patent Bar MPEP Q & A podcast

#Questions And Answers #Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Lisa Parmley #USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Law #News #Politics #Business #Business Disciplines #Podcasting Education

28:16

Gene Baur is the founder of Farm Sanctuary, a place of rescue, refuge, and adoption for hundreds of farm animals each year. Farm Sanctuary shelters enable visitors to connect with farm animals as emotional, intelligent individuals. Gene has also led campaigns to change laws about animal treatment and taken undercover photographs of farms, stockyards, and slaughterhouses, documenting deplorable conditions. His pictures and videos exposing factory farming cruelties have aired nationally and internationally, educating millions about the plight of modern farm animals, and his rescue work inspired an international farm sanctuary movement. Once called “the conscience of the food movement” by Time magazine, Gene walks the walk and talks the talk when it comes to food and animal rights. Jay and Gene discuss the political and cultural steps that will bring about the end of factory farming and a healthier approach to animals and food. Today's episode was produced by Tani Levitt and Mijon Zulu. To check out more episodes or to learn more about the show, you can visit our website Allaboutchangepodcast.com. If you like our show, spread the word, tell a friend or family member, or leave us a review on your favorite podcasting app. We really appreciate it. All About Change is produced by the Ruderman Family Foundation. Episode Chapters 0:00 Intro 1:05 The state of veganism 6:18 Cultural shifts around factory farming and veganism 14:58 Gene’s three paths of activism 17:44 Gene’s legislative successes 22:25 Accepting people where they are in their journeys 25:36 Thank you and goodbye For video episodes, watch on www.youtube.com/@therudermanfamilyfoundation Stay in touch: X: @JayRuderman | @RudermanFdn LinkedIn: Jay Ruderman | Ruderman Family Foundation Instagram: All About Change Podcast | Ruderman Family Foundation To learn more about the podcast, visit https://allaboutchangepodcast.com/ Looking for more insights into the world of activism? Be sure to check out Jay’s brand new book, Find Your Fight , in which Jay teaches the next generation of activists and advocates how to step up and bring about lasting change. You can find Find Your Fight wherever you buy your books, and you can learn more about it at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.jayruderman.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Поширити

Головна серій•Feed

Patent Bar Review

310 епізодів

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

42 subscribers

updated 4 дні тому

Поширити

Головна серій•Feed

Patent Bar Review

310 епізодів

#Questions And Answers #Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Lisa Parmley #USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Law #News #Politics #Business #Business Disciplines #Podcasting Education

Усі епізоди

1
MPEP Q & A 334: Assignee(s) who may conduct prosecution or reexamination. 3:01

4 дні тому3:01

3:01

Question: Which two types of assignee(s) may conduct either the prosecution of a national application for patent or a reexamination proceeding? Answer: The assignee(s) who may conduct either the prosecution of a national application for patent or a reexamination proceeding are: (1) A single assignee. An assignee of the entire right, title and interest in the […] The post MPEP Q & A 334: Assignee(s) who may conduct prosecution or reexamination. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 333: When a supplemental reissue oath or declaration is required. 3:22

18 днів тому3:22

3:22

Question: If additional defects or errors are corrected in the reissue after the filing of the reissue oath or declaration, is a supplemental reissue oath or declaration required? Answer: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, if additional defects or errors are corrected in the reissue after the filing of the reissue oath […] The post MPEP Q & A 333: When a supplemental reissue oath or declaration is required. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 332: Availability of provisional application relied on for priority and abandoned. 3:11

5 weeks тому3:11

3:11

Question: Is a provisional application that is relied upon for priority in a U.S. patent and is abandoned available through the Patent Center? Answer: Yes, a provisional application that is relied upon for priority in a U.S. patent and is abandoned may be available through the Patent Center. Generally though, provisional applications are not published and […] The post MPEP Q & A 332: Availability of provisional application relied on for priority and abandoned. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 331: Does new ground of rejection raised by the Board in an appeal reopen prosecution? 3:00

7 weeks тому3:00

3:00

Question: Does the new ground of rejection raised by the Board in an appeal reopen prosecution? Answer: The new ground of rejection raised by the Board does not reopen prosecution except as to that subject matter to which the new rejection was applied. If the Board’s decision in which the rejection was made includes an affirmance […] The post MPEP Q & A 331: Does new ground of rejection raised by the Board in an appeal reopen prosecution? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 330: Items the Technology Center will verify when a Request for Continuing Examination is initially processed. 3:16

9 weeks тому3:16

3:16

Question: Name two items the Technology Center will verify when a Request for Continuing Examination is initially processed. Answer: An RCE will be initially processed by the Technology Center (TC) assigned the application. Technical support personnel in the TC will verify that: (A) the application is a utility or plant application (i.e., not a design […] The post MPEP Q & A 330: Items the Technology Center will verify when a Request for Continuing Examination is initially processed. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 329: Non-exhaustive factors to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period. 2:43

11 weeks тому2:43

2:43

Question: What non-exhaustive factors may be considered to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period? Answer: The following non-exhaustive factors may be considered to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period: (1) Petitioner engaged in significant, constructive efforts with the examiner to resolve the issue outside of the petitions […] The post MPEP Q & A 329: Non-exhaustive factors to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 328: Reasons for insisting upon a restriction? 2:32

13 weeks тому2:32

2:32

Question: What are the reasons for insisting upon a restriction? Answer: Every requirement to restrict has two aspects: (A) the reasons (as distinguished from the mere statement of conclusion) why each inventionas claimed is either independent or distinct from the other(s); and (B) the reasons why there would be a serious search and/or examination burden on the […] The post MPEP Q & A 328: Reasons for insisting upon a restriction? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 327: Information submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid. 2:15

15 weeks тому2:15

2:15

Question: What information should also be submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid? Answer: The following information should also be submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid: (A) the fee year (i.e., 3 1/2, 7 1/2, or 11 1/2 year fee); (B) the […] The post MPEP Q & A 327: Information submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 326: Applications that count for “gross income” basis micro entity status. 2:44

17 weeks тому2:44

2:44

Question: What applications count for the filing limits for the purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis? Answer: For purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis, the application filing limit includes: (i) previously filed U.S. nonprovisional applications (e.g., utility, design, plant, continuation, and divisional applications), (ii) previously filed […] The post MPEP Q & A 326: Applications that count for “gross income” basis micro entity status. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. 2:53

19 weeks тому2:53

2:53

Question: List two pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. Answer: Each protest should be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER 37 CFR 1.291.” It is also important that any protest against a pending application specifically identify the application to which the protest is directed with the identification being […] The post MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. 3:01

21 weeks тому3:01

3:01

Question: Name at least two items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: (1) a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text […] The post MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? 3:19

23 weeks тому3:19

3:19

Question: Where a restriction (including an election of species) requirement was made in an application and applicant permitted the elected invention to issue as a patent without filing a divisional application on the non-elected invention(s) or on non-claimed subject matter distinct from the elected invention, can the non-elected invention(s) and non-claimed, distinct subject matter be […] The post MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? 2:26

25 weeks тому2:26

2:26

Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entry will be via […] The post MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? 3:41

27 weeks тому3:41

3:41

Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the […] The post MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

1
MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? 2:22

29 weeks тому2:22

2:22

Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] The post MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? 2:11

31 weeks тому2:11

2:11

Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee by a credit card, is […] The post MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. 2:39

33 weeks тому2:39

2:39

Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? 3:02

35 weeks тому3:02

3:02

Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specification and enabled by the original […] The post MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? 3:52

37 weeks тому3:52

3:52

Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may become necessary to […] The post MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. 3:11

39 weeks тому3:11

3:11

Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” […] The post MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? 3:30

41 weeks тому3:30

3:30

Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, the […] The post MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. 2:19

43 weeks тому2:19

2:19

Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. 3:18

45 weeks тому3:18

3:18

Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second petition […] The post MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) 3:23

47 weeks тому3:23

3:23

Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […] The post MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application 3:29

49 weeks тому3:29

3:29

Question: The three-month period in 37 CFR 1.704(b) applies to the Office notices and letters issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application (except a Notice of Omitted Items in a Nonprovisional Application as discussed above). List two examples of these notices. Answer: These notices include: A Notice of Incomplete Nonprovisional Application (except as to […] The post MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? 3:15

51 weeks тому3:15

3:15

Question: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text file submitted via the USPTO patent electronic […] The post MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? 3:35

1 year тому3:35

3:35

Question: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? Answer: A patent owner preliminary response may include one or more of the following arguments: The petitioner is statutorily barred from pursuing a review; The references asserted to establish that the claims are unpatentable are not in fact printed publications; The prior art […] The post MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 307: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? 2:55

1 year тому2:55

2:55

Question: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? Answer: As shown in chapter 600 … Electronic means or medium for filing IDSs are not permitted except for: IDSs electronically submitted using the USPTO patent electronic filing system; or copies of large tables, computer program listings, and sequence listings submitted as a PDF […] The post MPEP Q & A 307: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 306: Sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options? 3:05

1 year тому3:05

3:05

Question: Where a petitioner files a motion to seal with the petition that seeks entry of a protective order other than the default protective order, a patent owner may only access the sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options? Answer: Where a petitioner files a motion to seal with […] The post MPEP Q & A 306: Sealed confidential information prior to the institution of the trial by which options? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 305: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment? 2:29

1 year тому2:29

2:29

Question: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment? Answer: As shown in chapter 1800 … The supplemental search fee must be paid and be accompanied by: a protest and a request for refund of the supplemental search fee. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found […] The post MPEP Q & A 305: What must the supplemental search fee be accompanied by in addition to the payment? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 304: What does routine discovery include? 3:03

1 year тому3:03

3:03

Question: What does routine discovery include? Answer: Routine discovery includes: Production of any exhibit cited in a paper or testimony; The cross-examination of the other sides declarants; and Relevant information that is inconsistent with a position advanced during the proceeding. Routine discovery places the parties on a level playing field and streamlines the proceeding. Board […] The post MPEP Q & A 304: What does routine discovery include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 303: What should a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description? 2:15

1 year тому2:15

2:15

Question: What should a request for a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description? Answer: “A request for a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system should use the document description: Request for Certificate of Correction.” Chapter Details: The answer to this question can […] The post MPEP Q & A 303: What should a certificate of correction filed via the patent electronic filing system use as the document description? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 302: Major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act 3:30

1 year тому3:30

3:30

Question: What are the major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act? Answer: The major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act are the following: 35 U.S.C. 102(c)is keyed to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, while the CREATE Act (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)) focuses on the date that the claimed invention […] The post MPEP Q & A 302: Major differences between 35 U.S.C. 102(c) and the CREATE Act appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 301: What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to? 3:19

1 year тому3:19

3:19

Question: All substantive communications with the Board regarding a proceeding must include all parties to the proceeding, except as otherwise authorized. What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to? Answer: All substantive communications with the Board regarding a proceeding must include all parties to the proceeding, except as otherwise authorized. The prohibition […] The post MPEP Q & A 301: What does the prohibition on ex parte communications not extend to? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 300: Difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022 3:55

1 year тому3:55

3:55

Question: What is the difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022? Answer: For applications filed before July 1, 2022, the sequence listing can be a “Sequence Listing” (as an ACSII plain text file in compliance with 37 CFR 1.821-1.824) submission must be submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system […] The post MPEP Q & A 300: Difference between sequence listing requirements filed before or after July 1, 2022 appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 299: What should a motion to exclude evidence include? 3:23

1 year тому3:23

3:23

Question: What should a motion to exclude evidence include? Answer: A motion to exclude evidence should: (a) Identify where in the record the objection originally was made; (b) Identify where in the record the evidence sought to be excluded was relied upon by an opponent; (c) Address objections to exhibits in numerical order; and (d) […] The post MPEP Q & A 299: What should a motion to exclude evidence include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 298: Submission requirements for “Sequence Listing XML” 3:09

1 year тому3:09

3:09

Question: A “Sequence Listing XML” may be submitted as a XML file with a “.xml” extension via the USPTO patent electronic filing system or as read-only optical discs. What does such a submission require? Answer: Such submission requires that applicant provide a statement in a separate paragraph that incorporates by reference the material in the […] The post MPEP Q & A 298: Submission requirements for “Sequence Listing XML” appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 297: List two situations where a certificate of correction may not be appropriate. 3:37

1 year тому3:37

3:37

Question: List two exemplary situations where a certificate of correction under 35 U.S.C. 255 may not be appropriate. Answer: Exemplary situations where a certificate of correction under 35 U.S.C. 255 may not be appropriate: (A) Adding or correcting a claim to a prior application having a filing date before March 16, 2013 in a patent that was examined (as […] The post MPEP Q & A 297: List two situations where a certificate of correction may not be appropriate. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 296: List the criteria for “Large Tables” 2:48

1 year тому2:48

2:48

Question: List the criteria for “Large Tables” that may be submitted in electronic form in ASCII plain text. Answer: “Large Tables” that may be submitted in electronic form in ASCII plain text are: any individual table that is more than 50 pages in length, or multiple tables, if the total number of pages of all […] The post MPEP Q & A 296: List the criteria for “Large Tables” appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 295: Which of the new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for? 2:49

2 years тому2:49

2:49

Question: Which of the following new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for? Answer: The patent owner is afforded an opportunity to file a preliminary response for inter partes review (IPR), postgrant review (PGR), and covered business method patents (CBM). Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial […] The post MPEP Q & A 295: Which of the new trial proceedings can the patent owner file a preliminary response for? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 294: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has? 2:39

2 years тому2:39

2:39

Question: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has? Answer: Every requirement to restrict has two aspects: the reasons (as distinguished from the mere statement of conclusion) why each invention as claimedis either independent or distinct from the other(s); and the reasons why there would be a serious search and/or examination burden on […] The post MPEP Q & A 294: What are the two aspects every requirement to restrict has? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 293: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews? 2:23

2 years тому2:23

2:23

Question: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews? Answer: The Board is to conduct derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews. Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide November 2019”. This is a special supplement that at the time of […] The post MPEP Q & A 293: Who conducts derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews, and post-grant reviews? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 292: Two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides 3:22

2 years тому3:22

3:22

Question: List two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides for in the International Register by the International Bureau. Answer: Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides for the recording of certain changes in the International Register by the International Bureau, including: a change in ownership of the international registration; a change in the name or address […] The post MPEP Q & A 292: Two changes the Hague Agreement Article 16(1) provides appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 291: When did the derivation rules go into effect? 2:30

2 years тому2:30

2:30

Question: When did the derivation rules go into effect? Answer: The derivation rules went into effect 18 months after AIA enactment (March 16, 2013). Chapter Details: This question comes from the following supplement “Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consolidated Trial Practice Guide November 2019”. This is a special supplement that at the time of this […] The post MPEP Q & A 291: When did the derivation rules go into effect? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 290: Use of metric system of measurements in patent applications 3:12

2 years тому3:12