NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Restore Presidential Control over “Independent” CPSC Commissioners

Administrative Static Podcast

Вміст надано 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static. Весь вміст подкастів, включаючи епізоди, графіку та описи подкастів, завантажується та надається безпосередньо компанією 1360 KHNC and Administrative Static або його партнером по платформі подкастів. Якщо ви вважаєте, що хтось використовує ваш захищений авторським правом твір без вашого дозволу, ви можете виконати процедуру, описану тут https://uk.player.fm/legal.

6M ago 12:30

MP3•Головна епізоду

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on August 13, 2024 17:49 (5M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

NCLA has filed an amicus curiae brief urging the Supreme Court to hear Consumers’ Research v. Consumer Product Safety Commission. This case presents a golden opportunity to overturn the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor v. Federal Trade Commission decision and address the unconstitutional structure of the CPSC. Under current law, the President can only fire CPSC commissioners “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office,” insulating them from removal and violating the “Take Care” clause of Article II of the Constitution. The Fifth Circuit upheld this structure by invoking Humphrey’s Executor, which wrongly supported FTC Commissioners' similar protections.

In this episode, Senior Litigation Counsel Greg Dolin joins Mark and Vec to dive into the details and implications of this case.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

105 епізодів

#News #Government #1360 KHNC #Administrative Static