How the House vs NCAA Settlement could Impact Current NIL deals

Representation Without Taxation

This week, I’m joined by six law students from my Sports Law in Practice course at McGeorge School of Law. I challenged my students to research the House v. NCAA settlement and explore innovative ways to implement its key provisions.

In this episode, Joe Devlin, Chris Adams, Malea Parcasio-Eshelman, Zachary Hernandez, Keith Dawson, and Eduardo Flores-Covarrubias dive into key aspects of the House v. NCAA settlement. They break down the definition of an Associate Entity (Booster), analyze whether the arbitration system in the case will be effective, and explore how the settlement could impact current NIL deals. Tune in for valuable insights on these critical issues shaping the future of college athletics!

This is the Second episode of a four-part series on implementing the House case—stay tuned! One of these ideas might be exactly what your team, university, or athletics department needs.

If you need representation or a sports lawyer to review your contract, schedule a free consultation with Jill McBride Baxter.

Set Up a Free Strategy Call with Veteran Sports Attorney Jill McBride Baxter https://calendly.com/jillbaxter/one-on-one-meeting

Jill Cell 559-250-0151 Jill email [email protected]

Follow Jill IG https://www.instagram.com/agentjillbaxter/

Follow Jill Twitter https://www.twitter.com/agentjillbaxter

Follow Jill on YouTube https://youtube.com/user/jillbaxterAGP

Follow Jill on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/agentjillmcbridebaxter

Follow Jill on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/jillmcbridebaxter

Visit Jill’s Website https://www.jillmcbridebaxter.com

Purchase my book Born to Be a Sports Agent https://www.borntobeasportsagent.com or Amazon

Subscribe and Share this, my podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/representation-without-taxation/id1356954624