Is Proof of Stake a security? A Debate! Adam Cochran vs Adam Levitin


Manage episode 341711940 series 3321692
Зроблено Yehoshua Zlotogorski і знайдено завдяки Player FM та нашій спільноті. Авторські права належать видавцю, а не Player FM, і аудіоматеріали транслюються безпосередньо з сервера видавця. Натисніть на кнопку Підписатися, щоб слідкувати за оновленнями в Player FM або скопіюйте і вставте посилання на канал до іншої програми для подкастів.

"I'll take the opposed, in that I think there is decent precedent to find ETH to not be a security in a post-merge environment. Let's breakdown some specifics:"

In this readthrough I'm going to Twitter for the first time to read a 43 long tweet thread (yup - 43 tweets) by @adamscochran, aka Adam Cochran, Partner at CEHV and Adj. Professor of Info Sci/Biz Analysis. He analyzes whether Ethereum's shift to Proof of Stake makes it eligible to be names a security by the SEC and analyzes Ethereum vs the Howie test, previous rulings in the US court system and theories of what different staking make ups could lead to.


👉 Start learning with Alpe:

This episode is brought to you by Alpe Audio. Want to learn on the go but need more depth than a podcast? Alpe is the app for you. It’s an audio education app that brings great in depth courses that are as fun as podcasts but as educational as well, a degree. Each lesson comes with summaries, additional resources, flash cards and more. You can even find Ethereum Audible on Alpe with all those additional resources.


Follow Adam on Twitter: @adamscochran

Adam Levitin's tweet thread making the case for why PoS is a security:

Adam Chocran's tweet thread responding and making the case why PoS is NOT a security:

Adam has put the thread into a website:

Are you interested in Tokenomics? I'm collecting everything that I'm learning about tokenomics into a free email course & newsletter you can find here:

59 епізодів